Skip to content
LatestCanada, U.S. officials to meet again as 50% tariffs to take effect in 3 days
CityAM Canada

Canadian business, markets & economy · Monday, 17 August 2026

  • Business
  • Markets
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Opinion
Monday 08 February 2016 4:37 pm

UK Waspi pensions campaign: The government must revisit changes to the state pension age that disadvantage women

By: Jessica Morris

Add as a preferred source on Google

We in the SNP are not against equalisation of the state pension age; that’s not why we support the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) campaign.

It's perfectly fair for men and women to retire at the same age. However, the pace of the process and the lack of transitional arrangements make up the real issue here.

To illustrate the problem, a woman born on the 10th February 1950 achieved pensionable age on 10 Feb 2010, aged 60. A woman born just five years later in 1955 won’t get her pension until 10 February 2012, aged 66 years.

The complex transitional arrangements currently in place mean that someone born on the 10th Feb 1953 got their first pension payment last month, in January 2016, aged 62 years and 10 months – while someone born a year later in 1954 must wait an additional two-and-a-half years until July 2019, aged 65 years and four months.

This can't be right – the pace of change is far too dramatic. Women of this generation had an expectation that, having paid national insurance contributions throughout their working lives, they were entitled to a state pension. The goalposts have not been moved, so much as smashed and broken.

Read more: Minister says women losing out due to state pension age changes should use "other benefits" such as job seekers allowance

We in the SNP believe that government has a responsibility to look after people who have worked and now look forward to retirement. Women who often experienced inequality in pay and opportunities early in their working lives are now to be faced with the prospect of having to wait for something to which they believed they had an unassailable right.

On 7th January , our SNP motion calling on the government to introduce better transitional arrangements for those women negatively affected by the changes was carried in parliament by 158 votes to zero.

But because this was a backbench debate, the decision was non-binding and the government, only a very few of whom actually attended the debate, are not compelled to act on it. What does that say about parliamentary democracy in this country?

One thing is crystal-clear: if we had powers over pensions in Scotland, the Scottish Government would do the right thing for our pensioners. The UK government plough on regardless, ignoring the claims of the Waspi () campaign and neglecting the needs of their people. ​

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Jobs and Money

Categories

  • Personal Development

Trending Articles

  • Is the Zeekr 9X Super Hybrid the new luxury SUV to beat?

  • Grandparents fund university degrees to avoid inheritance tax net

  • US bond market jitters spark UK economy recession warning

  • FTSE 100 Live: Stocks rise as Trump threatens to declare Strait of Hormuz as US territory

  • Aldi boss wades into supermarket ‘price-gouging’ row

More from CityAM

  • Pension pressure to help swell UK debt to three times size of economy

    Economics
    Two older women exercising at an outdoor gym in sunshine
  • Ask the expert: How do I avoid double tax on my pension?

    Personal Finance
    Marianna Hunt discussing financial strategies at a business conference, wearing a professional suit, engaging with the aud...
  • The pensions triple lock is a travesty. Our politicians must fess up

    Opinion
    Young people face the risk of failing to save enough in their pension
  • Rupert Lowe axes pensions triple lock and pledges tax cuts in economic plan

    Politics
    Rupert Lowe, former Southampton FC chairman, smiles while holding files on a city street, wearing a suit and pink tie
  • Pensioners hit with £8bn tax bill after government freezes allowances

    Personal Finance
    City economists have warned that the triple lock pension is unsustainable and unaffordable given the state of the UK's public finances.
  • Jenrick: Welfare cuts worth £50bn allows us to ‘sustainably pay’ triple lock pension

    Politics
    Robert Jenrick speaking at a podium with BRITAIN NEEDS REFORM sign, delivering a speech.
  • State-backed pension scheme plans to pump £1bn into start-ups

    Investing
    City economists have warned that the triple lock pension is unsustainable and unaffordable given the state of the UK's public finances.
  • London Stock Exchange boss: We should know which companies our pensions are backing

    Markets
    Julia Hoggett and Rachel Reeves with other women leaders at a financial event, discussing pension industry overhaul.
CityAM Canada

Independent Canadian business, markets and economic journalism, published by CityAM Publishing in Toronto. Read our editorial standards and corrections policy.

CityAM Publishing, 3 Borden Street #301, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2M8, Canada.
Newsroom enquiries: contact the editorial desk.

Follow

LinkedInXRSSApple News

Sections

BusinessMarketsEconomyTechnologyPoliticsEnergyPropertyOpinion

Newsroom

About usEditorial standardsCorrectionsOur journalistsContact

Company

AdvertisePrivacy noticeTerms of useCookie preferences

© 2026 CityAM Publishing. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTermsCookiesContact

Nothing published on CityAM Canada constitutes investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. CityAM Canada is an independent Canadian edition and is not affiliated with any UK publication.