LatestUnion warns workers paying price of Canada-U.S. trade war

Canadian business, markets & economy · Wednesday, 16 September 2026

Business

Upper Tribunal upholds FCA lifetime ban on Crispin Odey, reduces fine to £1.53 million

Judges dismissed the hedge‑fund founder’s appeal, confirming he is not a fit‑and‑proper person for financial services and cutting the FCA’s proposed penalty by £300,000.

Upper Tribunal courtroom inside the Royal Courts of Justice, London

Judges reduced the Financial Conduct Authority’s proposed penalty for former hedge‑fund boss Crispin Odey from £1.83 million to £1.53 million, while confirming the regulator’s lifetime ban on his participation in UK financial services.

Fine cut to £1.53 million

The Upper Tribunal’s decision, issued on 14 September 2026, lowered the fine by £300,000. The original figure of £1.83 million had been set by the FCA in March 2025 when it first imposed the lifetime prohibition (source: The Guardian).

FCA fine reduction following Upper Tribunal decision
ItemAmount (GBP)
Original proposed fine£1.83 million
Reduced fine after tribunal£1.53 million
Source: The Guardian – Crispin Odey loses appeal against lifetime ban

Background to the FCA’s ban

The FCA imposed a lifetime prohibition on Odey in March 2025 after an internal investigation uncovered multiple sexual‑harassment complaints at Odey Asset Management. The regulator also proposed a £1.83 million fine for breaches of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime and for attempts to obstruct the investigation.

Odey, a Conservative party donor who resigned from his firm in 2023, appealed the ban on the grounds that the FCA had acted unfairly. The appeal was heard by the Upper Tribunal, which is the specialist judicial body for regulatory disputes.

Tribunal’s reasoning

The judges concluded that Odey “lacked integrity” and was therefore “not a fit and proper person” for participation in regulated financial activities. In their ruling they wrote:

“We have found that Mr Odey lacked integrity… Mr Odey is not a fit and proper person and it is reasonable for the authority to have concluded that a prohibition order is appropriate.”

The language mirrors the FCA’s original assessment and leaves the lifetime ban in place, meaning Odey cannot hold any regulated role in the UK financial sector.

Timeline of the case

  • March 2025 – FCA imposes lifetime ban and proposes a £1.83 million fine.
  • 2023 – Odey resigns from Odey Asset Management after harassment allegations become public.
  • September 2020 – Internal investigation at OAM uncovers sexual‑harassment claims.
  • 14 September 2026 – Upper Tribunal dismisses Odey’s appeal, upholds ban and reduces fine to £1.53 million.

The decision reinforces the FCA’s willingness to pursue senior figures who are deemed to have compromised market integrity. By confirming the lifetime prohibition, the tribunal signals that the fit‑and‑proper test will continue to be applied rigorously, even where the individual has already stepped away from day‑to‑day management.

For market participants, the ruling does not alter any immediate operational exposure – Odey already left the firm – but it does close the door on any future re‑entry into regulated roles. The reduced fine still represents a material penalty, though the £300,000 reduction reflects the tribunal’s assessment that the original amount was excessive given the circumstances.

FCA profile

The Financial Conduct Authority is headquartered at 25 North Colonnade in London, United Kingdom. It was established on 1 April 2013, taking over many of the responsibilities of the former Financial Services Authority. The regulator’s chief executive is not confirmed in the packet and should be verified against the FCA’s own filings before publication.

While the packet does not provide headcount or revenue figures, the FCA is the primary overseer of conduct in UK banking, asset management and securities markets, and its enforcement actions are closely watched by investors for signals about regulatory risk.

What remains unknown

The packet does not disclose whether the FCA will seek any additional civil recovery beyond the reduced fine, nor does it detail any further sanctions that might be imposed on Odey’s former firms. The exact date in March 2025 when the original ban was announced is listed as “2025‑03‑xx”, indicating the precise day was not captured.

Finally, the current chief executive of the FCA and the regulator’s staff numbers are not provided; those details should be confirmed from the FCA’s latest annual report before any follow‑up reporting.

Overall, the Upper Tribunal’s ruling provides a clear regulatory outcome: Crispin Odey remains barred for life from UK financial services, and the fine he must pay stands at £1.53 million.

About the author

Claire Bennett

Reporting for CityAM Canada on business and the wider Canadian economy.

All work by Claire Bennett ›